Sunday, March 27, 2005

Blogs


I decided give blogging a go. Sure, I have a few domains I manage but a blogging is a little different. One difference is the publishing. I chose to try Blogger just because of the ease of publishing. In other words, it looks easy. Blogger is owned by Google, a search engine I try not to use. Every time I hear someone use 'Google' as a verb I cringe. Do we really want one company to monopolize how the Web is searched? I prefer Yahoo!

Anyway, some debate has ensued over bloggers due to their role in the 2004 election and their role in exposing Dan Rather's attempt to show some Microsoft Word documents as proof of George W. Bush's lack of commitment to his National Guard duty in the early 1970's.

Some claim bloggers are not legitimate journalists. I ask, then, what makes a legitimate journalist? Working at a company that has a printing press the size of a small house? Working for an entity that has a call letter beginning with a 'W' or a 'K?'

If newspaper reporters and TV anchorman say something is true should be believe them? Are they less likely to tilt the truth or spin an opinion then a blogger?

An example: if I go to a local public meeting, and the events at this meeting are covered and published by a newspaper reporter, we tend to believe it, right? If I go to the same meeting and publish a story on my blog about it, do people believe it? Maybe. They might believe the newspaper account as accurate. People might think that, as a blogger, I am putting my own personal spin on the story. How do we know the newspaper reporter is not doing the same? We don't.1

What I think is happening is that people see something on the Web and now they realize just because it's on the Web, doesn't mean it's true. However, that thinking has now trickled down to the TV newscasts and newspapers. If it's published or reported by a stuffed shirt, people are beginning to realize it may not always be true. The big news companies are beginning to worry about this and will lobby Congress more aggressively to monitor the bloggers.

We must remember that Freedom of the Press cannot exist without Freedom of Speech yet both are intertwined. A restriction on one is certainly a restriction on the other. People have the right to find out any information about any political candidate at any time; be it two weeks, or two minutes before we cast our vote.

As a people, we need to preserve the right to search the truth and expose inconsistencies, be they from the government or from CBS News. Blogging will enable us to do so. Intelligent people are able to gather news from the press and from blogs and decide what is true and what is false.

That's all for now.

Back to Google, here are some links:

http://www.google-watch.org
http://oak.psych.gatech.edu/~epic/

For the latter, it requires Flash.



Brian


1. However, many people think that the only reporters capable of spinning a story work for Fox News while totally discounting the possibility that reporters for other news stations cannot ever spin a story to the left. This is a two-way street, people.


11 Comments:

At 16:24, Anonymous said...

Brian,
You fail to mention the fact that journalists are generally educated in their trade, and the companies they work for are usually established businesses that wish to stay that way. I'm not sure about any legalities related to being called a 'journalist', but I'm sure if you asked one, they would disagree with your over-simplified view of them. I do think there are rules they try to follow. FOX news, of course, doesn't employ journalists. They are commentators, actors, retired Generals, and other opinionated personalities.

 
At 17:00, Brian said...

Anonymous (4:24),

Does one need to be educated in a trade to express Freedom of Speech or to expose a story as being true or false?

 
At 19:46, Bob Gloor said...

I agree with you, Brian. Moreover, it's not necessary to be educated whatsoever for someone to post an opinion. I think the only thing necessary is to have the courage of one's own convictions. Therefore, I am always amused by those who want to their voices to be heard, yet for some reason choose to hide behind the name, "anonymous!" If they truly believe in what they espouse, why must they hide their identities?? "I feel this way,.... but don't try to guess who I am!" Gimme a break!

Robert W. Gloor (a.k.a. Uncle Bob)
711 Hillcrest Blvd.
Phillipsburg, NJ 088865
908-859-0265
Cell# 908-319-2290

PS: Great Website!

 
At 21:04, Anonymous said...

I saw that one coming. But your outspoken-ness isn't going to draw me out from under my 'anonymous' cover. I still would like, however, to see a response from a true journalist, regards your feelings toward their education. How would it make you feel if a journalist made similar comments about your occupation (politician?;^))

 
At 23:42, Brian said...

They are free to start their own blog and do so. Let them make a point and try to defend it rather than mold their news items to fit into the corporate GroupThink of their employer.

Being "trained" to be a journalist doesn't mean he/she is any good at it. The same holds true for any profession. How many MBA's work at Dell or Microsoft - companies founded by college dropouts Michael Dell and Bill Gates?

 
At 06:54, Bob Gloor said...

Dear anonymous,
I wonder if you peeked out from beneath the rock you call home to see this one coming:
I refer to your latest discharge of plebeian verbiage, in which you have proven once again that there is no such thing as unutterable nonsense. Rumor has it that you are almost incomprehensible in person (as revealed by your desperate urge to babble nonsensically on message boards.) No doubt this rumor is true.

Here's a tip: no one will ever know that you've had a lobotomy if you wear a wig to hide to the scars. Stop posting your drivel on message boards, and learn to control the slobbering. Generally, there is nothing wrong with having nothing worthwhile to say, unless you insist on saying it. However, I'll consider letting you have the last word if you guarantee it will be your last. I suggest you heed Mark Twain's advice; "It is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."

Most repair manuals are far more interesting than you, and far less turgid to read. I bet you thought it was just coincidence that your parents had the same surnames before they married. Maybe your comments wouldn't be so mundane if that pimple on your ass hadn't turned out to be a brain tumor, if you weren't so fat that when you stand on the weighing scale, it reads: "To be continued!", or if you didn't have a face that makes Bella Lugosi look like a supermodel. No, come to think of it, you would.

To sum up: To continue any meaningful discourse with a faceless entity is pointless. I'd rather pass the world's largest kidney stone than read another post from you.

 
At 08:49, Brian said...

PLEASE

If someone wishes to remain anonymous let them do so. As long as he/she posts relevant comments and opinions I will welcome them. Please don't berate someone because that person chooses to be unknown. I don't want to disable comments completely.

THANK YOU

 
At 20:48, Anonymous said...

"Hear me, my Chiefs! My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever!"

Chief Joseph
Nez Perce
Oct. 5, 1877

 
At 00:09, Bob Gloor said...

.........sorry Brian. I'll try to control myself!

Chief Joseph

 
At 08:37, Chief Joseph said...

White men both lie. I never say that! Me good journalist.

 
At 23:12, SaveKerry said...

Anonymous,
If a journalist, or anyone else, makes a comment about my profession (shepherd) or yours, how we feel about it doesn't matter. They still have the right to say it, and we in turn have the right to defend our opinions about their profession or defend our professions. I wouldn't jump for joy if I read a negative comment about my profession, but I'd rather be able to answer back if I chose to than be subject to rules about what I can or cannot say about journalists, or any other profession, even if those rules "protect" me from seeing negative comments about myself.


Besides, I've been to P'burg, and I think I'd rather live under a rock!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home